• Products
  • Insights
  • Practice Management
  • Resources
  • About Us

As the US congressional elections approach, polls increasingly suggest that the Democrats will gain control of at least one house of Congress. Historically, during periods when opposing parties have controlled the legislative and executive branches of government, major shifts in policy have been few and markets have often responded favorably.

However, this doesn’t mean that US and global investors have no reason to pay close attention to the upcoming election. Since the COVID pandemic, the increasing importance of US fiscal policy for markets has made every election consequential for investors.

In addition, this year’s midterms may also provide valuable insight into the longer-term direction of US policy on everything from interest rates to inflation to artificial intelligence. Those insights could help investors identify potential opportunities in an evolving environment.

 

Split or Sweep?
One possibility is that Republicans could retain the Senate while Democrats take control of the House of Representatives. This would limit the chances for new legislation and increase the potential for congressional oversight of the president. The House contest includes approximately 29 competitive or toss-up seats, and a shift of roughly 4 to 5 seats could mean a change of control.

More recently, the possibility has risen that Democrats could win control of the Senate as well as the House. A Democratic sweep could bring increased focus on healthcare, affordability, consumer protection, and other Democratic campaign themes.

Legislative gridlock between a split- or Democrat-controlled Congress and a Republican president would likely limit additional spending. Treasury yields could face less upward pressure, although the same outcome might be less supportive of economic growth.

The prospect that a split- or Democrat-controlled Congress could be sworn in come January could prompt congressional Republicans to push to accomplish as many of their policy priorities as possible in a lame-duck session before the end of the year. These could include increased defense spending connected to the Iran war, more funding for agriculture, and changes to infrastructure spending. Together, these measures could form a package of new spending as large as half a percent of GDP.

Regardless of the election result, however, President Donald Trump will remain able to take executive action on trade, regulation, foreign policy, and more.

 

The outcome of the election may have little influence on rising prices. 

Don’t Forget the Debt

Politicians of both parties are campaigning more on worries about inflation and the economy than on the federal government’s growing debt. However, the federal debt ceiling will need to be raised by next year. The manner in which that takes place matters for markets—and potentially for the government’s credit rating.

Investors will be watching to see whether Republicans attempt to raise the ceiling during the year-end lame-duck session or whether Democrats will be able to use the issue as negotiating leverage next year after sweeping congressional elections.

While candidates of both parties are appealing to voters’ concerns about inflation and affordability, the outcome of the election may have little influence on rising prices. That’s because the current surge in inflation is being driven in part by energy supply issues resulting from the war in the Middle East. Unlike demand-driven inflation, the Federal Reserve’s ability to fight supply-related inflation is limited, so affordability is likely to be an ongoing challenge for policymakers and consumers alike, regardless of who controls Congress.

 

Will AI Be Regulated?

Investors’ expectations about the future of AI have become major drivers of both equity and fixed-income markets. However, voters are increasingly concerned about risks that AI may pose to many aspects of their lives, and politicians’ campaigns have responded with calls to regulate what has, thus far, been a largely self-regulating industry. While the Trump administration is mostly opposed to government regulation of AI, the election outcome may lay the groundwork for future regulation.

Here are some possible scenarios:

  • A Democratic sweep could bring greater scrutiny of data centers and other AI-related developments, especially because of concerns about affordability and safety.

  • Regulation could be catalyzed by an accident or other event.

  • If no immediate catalyst occurs, the 2028 election could feature candidates campaigning on AI regulation, with possible bipartisan support emerging in 2029.

  • National security concerns may favor a lighter regulatory approach because policymakers view AI as strategic infrastructure and worry that regulation could slow innovation relative to China.

 

If the election results don’t lead to a year-end spending package, the US could experience half a percent of fiscal tightening next year.

 

Why It Matters for Global Investors

Non-US investors should watch for a potential year-end spending package to emerge from Congress because it could influence US economic growth, interest rates, and inflation in ways that may have asset-allocation implications. If the election results don’t lead to a year-end package, the US could experience half a percent of fiscal tightening next year—a notable shift from the post-COVID period.

Investors may also want to watch how an emerging split in the Democratic party between moderates and progressives plays out on election day. The results could signal whether the 2028 election will be contested over entitlement spending and healthcare reform or greater compromise on tax policy.

 

Your financial professional can help you build a portfolio that’s right for you despite political uncertainty.

 

Important Risks: Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal.  • Fixed income security risks include credit, liquidity, call, duration, event and interest-rate risk. As interest rates rise, bond prices generally fall.

The views expressed here are those of the authors. They should not be construed as investment advice. They are based on available information and are subject to change without notice. Portfolio positioning is at the discretion of the individual portfolio management teams; individual portfolio management teams, and different fund sub-advisers, may hold different views and may make different investment decisions for different clients or portfolios. This material and/or its contents are current as of the time of writing and may not be reproduced or distributed in whole or in part, for any purpose, without the express written consent of Wellington Management or Hartford Funds. 

 

 


WP929 6056855
Insight From Sub-Adviser Wellington Management
Author Headshot
Macro Strategist
Author Headshot
Geopolitical Analyst

The material on this site is for informational and educational purposes only. The material should not be considered tax or legal advice and is not to be relied on as a forecast. The material is also not a recommendation or advice regarding any particular security, strategy or product. Hartford Funds does not represent that any products or strategies discussed are appropriate for any particular investor so investors should seek their own professional advice before investing. Hartford Funds does not serve as a fiduciary. Content is current as of the publication date or date indicated, and may be superseded by subsequent market and economic conditions.

Investing involves risk, including the possible loss of principal. Investors should carefully consider a fund's investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses. This and other important information is contained in the mutual fund, or ETF summary prospectus and/or prospectus, which can be obtained from a financial professional and should be read carefully before investing.

Mutual funds are distributed by Hartford Funds Distributors, LLC (HFD), Member FINRA|SIPC. ETFs are distributed by ALPS Distributors, Inc. (ALPS). Advisory services may be provided by Hartford Funds Management Company, LLC (HFMC) or its wholly owned subsidiary, Lattice Strategies LLC (Lattice). Certain funds are sub-advised by Wellington Management Company LLP and/or Schroder Investment Management North America Inc (SIMNA). Schroder Investment Management North America Ltd. (SIMNA Ltd) serves as a secondary sub-adviser to certain funds. HFMC, Lattice, Wellington Management, SIMNA, and SIMNA Ltd. are all SEC registered investment advisers. The funds and other products referred to on this Site may be offered and sold only to persons in the United States and its territories.

Hartford Funds refers to HFD, Lattice, and HFMC, which are currently not affiliated with any sub-adviser or ALPS.

On June 3, 2026, The Hartford Insurance Group, Inc. (“The Hartford”) and Wellington announced that they had reached a definitive agreement under which Wellington Investment Advisors Holdings, LLP, Wellington’s corporate parent, will acquire Hartford Funds. Upon closing Hartford Funds will be integrated into Wellington’s U.S. Wealth business. The deal is expected to close in the first quarter of 2027, subject to regulatory and fund approvals. Upon closing, Hartford Funds would become an affiliate of Wellington. For more information, click here.

© Copyright 2026 Hartford Funds Management Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Not FDIC Insured | No Bank Guarantee | May Lose Value